Difference between revisions of "Questions"
→Interest in Modeling Tutorial?
imported>DragoonWraith m (→Interest in Modeling Tutorial?: formatting) |
imported>Sickleyield |
||
| Line 1,838: | Line 1,838: | ||
:::::By the way, I just want to make sure, you saw the other half of my response? I kind of split your last post in half and addressed each individually, want to make sure that you're following the discussion correctly (because as TheImperialDragon mentioned, it's gotten pretty convoluted). | :::::By the way, I just want to make sure, you saw the other half of my response? I kind of split your last post in half and addressed each individually, want to make sure that you're following the discussion correctly (because as TheImperialDragon mentioned, it's gotten pretty convoluted). | ||
::::[[User: SickleYield|SickleYield]] 19:36 1 October 2006 (Pacific Time) | |||
No, actually, I only just saw that second part. Thanks for pointing it out. | |||
The thing is that I don't actually agree completely. My preference in tutorials for my own use is always for a complete process - I hate to be jumping around all over the place. This is particularly true for those of us using dialup who have to invest a LOT more time the more links there are. That's why "three dozen links to short pages" is not necessarily always preferable to "very large block of text." Then the dialup-constrained modder can copy and paste the longer tutorial structure and use it when they're not online. | |||
I've also had the frustration of piecing together bits from lots of different tutorials in order to make my armor and weapons, so I'm not thrilled with that either. :) | |||