Difference between revisions of "Talk:MessageBox Tutorial"
stick with activators, IMO
imported>Haama (Did you see the response above?) |
imported>DragoonWraith (stick with activators, IMO) |
||
| Line 183: | Line 183: | ||
:Wrote Ulysses, Finnigan's Wake - used Stream of Consciousness in his writing... sometimes for 200 pages. BTW, I made another reply to your first section. | :Wrote Ulysses, Finnigan's Wake - used Stream of Consciousness in his writing... sometimes for 200 pages. BTW, I made another reply to your first section. | ||
:--[[User:Haama|Haama]] 12:59, 26 August 2007 (EDT) | :--[[User:Haama|Haama]] 12:59, 26 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
---- | |||
OK, as before, I haven't followed all of this. You guys write a lot. | |||
My thoughts are this: If you want a spell to trigger a menu system, you have the spell set a variable and have the menu script in an activator. Same with tokens - if you need tokens to determine whether or not a menu should be displayed, have the tokens set variables on the activator and have the activator run the script. Tokens and spells add a ton of headaches, complexity, and possiblity for errors that are just completely unnecessary in '''every''' situation. Unless I am seriously missing something, there is no good reason to have the menu script actually within the spells or tokens. It's unnecessary and error-prone, and really is not any simpler.<br /> | |||
[[User:DragoonWraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">D</span>ragoon <span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">W</span>raith]] [[User_talk:DragoonWraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">TALK</span>]] 13:29, 26 August 2007 (EDT) | |||