Difference between revisions of "Talk:Weapon"

Talk:Weapon (edit)

7 bytes removed , 00:26, 10 June 2009

no edit summary

Anonymous user

Revision as of 00:26, 10 June 2009 (edit) imported>TejÃ³n ← Older edit		Revision as of 00:26, 10 June 2009 (edit) (undo) imported>TejÃ³n Newer edit →
Line 29:		Line 29:

	== Weapon Reach ==		== Weapon Reach ==
	This has been annoying to test because GetDistance is from the model's origin point, which can be nowhere near the point of collision, especially on the Z axis. The best option I could come up with was turning off Rohssan's AI so she didn't mind me smacking her upside the head repeatedly. Anyway: my impression is that the formula for reach is roughly ~~<math>~~64 + (64 * WeaponReach)~~</math>~~ distance units. The constant 64 might vary by actor size/model, I haven't tested that. Also, if this is accurate, unarmed strikes appear to have a reach of 0.4. --[[User:Tejón\|tejón]] 01:26, 10 June 2009 (EDT)		This has been annoying to test because GetDistance is from the model's origin point, which can be nowhere near the point of collision, especially on the Z axis. The best option I could come up with was turning off Rohssan's AI so she didn't mind me smacking her upside the head repeatedly. Anyway: my impression is that the formula for reach is roughly '''64 + (64 * WeaponReach)''' distance units. The constant 64 might vary by actor size/model, I haven't tested that. Also, if this is accurate, unarmed strikes appear to have a reach of 0.4. --[[User:Tejón\|tejón]] 01:26, 10 June 2009 (EDT)