Difference between revisions of "Talk:OBSE Wish List"

::::::The problem I saw with this is that I personally don't know how much "lists" exist. It might just be too much work to sort all items by type. Then again ... if this sorting get's done in idle time (i.e. all the time, so that each time only a small portion needs to be re-sorted), this could have a significant good impact on performance. It could also mean though that general performance decreases when running obse. But now that I think of it again ... it is certainly better if the executable did this sorting in native code rather than us doing it in pseudo-code. [[User:GreyWanderer|Grey]] 12:19, 4 August 2006 (EDT)

::::::The problem I saw with this is that I personally don't know how much "lists" exist. It might just be too much work to sort all items by type. Then again ... if this sorting get's done in idle time (i.e. all the time, so that each time only a small portion needs to be re-sorted), this could have a significant good impact on performance. It could also mean though that general performance decreases when running obse. But now that I think of it again ... it is certainly better if the executable did this sorting in native code rather than us doing it in pseudo-code. [[User:GreyWanderer|Grey]] 12:19, 4 August 2006 (EDT)

''Set/ModObjectValue [value] [number] - ability to manipulate the stats of objects, such as changing the damage done by a weapon. (finding and changing the current enchantment [i.e. recharge a weapon over time] was specifically requested)

''Set/ModObjectValue [value] [number] - ability to manipulate the stats of objects, such as changing the damage done by a weapon. (finding and changing the current enchantment [i.e. recharge a weapon over time] was specifically requested)

...

...

Btw, is it even theoretically possible? I'd very much to hear that before I'll get all hopeful.

Btw, is it even theoretically possible? I'd very much to hear that before I'll get all hopeful.