Talk:Creating Large Worldspaces

More Notes

As for region generation I'm not so sure the 'requirements' listed for deleting content in bordering regions is really necessary. I'm running a rather large experiment on the whole subject for the next couple days. But I think it's been over complicated a little in the original article. --Bruno 17:14, 16 January 2011 (EST)

I'm applying a different method here:

1 - I'm not worrying about having my region borders separate from my region content. First of all because it's not practical when creating a large worldspace. The potential for errors in locating region borders is tremendous. I followed the region borders instructions to the best of my ability. I then merged with the .esm. However, in many, many cases during region content generation I've already deleted some region borders and completely reconstructed them with no apparent side effect.

2 - As for deleting content in neighboring regions? I've dispensed with that suggestion entirely. I've done up-close inspections of neighboring regions where this suggestion was followed and where it was not followed - in fact abused excessively and intentionally - and found no evidence of objects being copied on top of each other. If this is happening it is minute and the suggestions for avoiding it seem more expensive time wise than just manually deleting unnecessary objects.

Old Notes

(Content moved to body of article.) --Bruno 14:01, 16 January 2011 (EST)

This all looks very good - why not include it in the main article proper? Yours looks better than what's there, for that matter!

Dragoon Wraith TALK 15:07, 15 January 2011 (EST)

I've noticed I have three stages of editing information:

1 - I try to find and follow directions.

2 - I find things about the directions I think are faulty and so I edit the directions

3 - Time passes and some or all things I thought were bunk end up being true. So I go back and edit them again.

So instead of doing 2 in the main article, I thought it would be best to put my notes in the Discussion area first so as not to look like a fool and screw someone else up in their endeavors. :-D --Bruno 14:01, 16 January 2011 (EST)

OK, fair enough; carry on then. Excellent work all around! That's even better, honestly - I appreciate you checking back and correcting misunderstandings even more than the initial commentary, heh!

Dragoon Wraith TALK 16:45, 16 January 2011 (EST)