Category talk:OBSE Functions

Shouldn't CON_*.* be sortet in in "C" instead of the starting letter of the consolefunctions?--JOG 03:27, 26 August 2006 (EDT)

Dragoon Wraith TALK 08:14, 26 August 2006 (EDT): The reason I didn't was because I didn't want the console functions to all be listed under 'C' in Console Functions, and I figured alphabetization should be consistent. If you think it's better to have them all under 'C' in OBSE Functions, then all that would need to be done is to change [[Category: OBSE Functions|<function name>]] on the bottom of each page to [[Category: OBSE Functions]].

Doubt about categories for OBSE functions

I'm checking and updating all OBSE functions. When I find a function with the old categories (OBSE <category>) I use to add the new ones (<category> (OBSE)). Must I delete the old categories from these functions? I ask it because I have found some functions with both kind of categories. Can somebody clearify this to me? Thank you. --WereWolf 17:10, 11 September 2007 (EDT)

Yes, the old category type (OBSE <category>) is being phased out. Those were mistakes (or at one point, we were thinking about having both until everything was done, but it's not necessary).

--Haama 17:47, 11 September 2007 (EDT)