Difference between revisions of "Talk:A beginner's guide - Appendix 3"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Clearance (Suggestion to proceed) |
imported>Qazaaq (→Shortages: go ahead) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Shortages== | ==Shortages== | ||
I'm not a friend of making a "''.. re-jig of the instructions in the Wiki for the packages''". If package pages are edited with more information,it isn't reflected here. (It is a general rule for knowledge bases to avoid double occurrences of records.) - I suggest to replaces the "re-jig" with short descritive sentences of the purpose of the packages and for details provide the links to the package pages. Is this ok for everybody? --[[User:Clearance|Clearance]] 00:01, 24 November 2010 (EST) | I'm not a friend of making a "''.. re-jig of the instructions in the Wiki for the packages''". If package pages are edited with more information,it isn't reflected here. (It is a general rule for knowledge bases to avoid double occurrences of records.) - I suggest to replaces the "re-jig" with short descritive sentences of the purpose of the packages and for details provide the links to the package pages. Is this ok for everybody? --[[User:Clearance|Clearance]] 00:01, 24 November 2010 (EST) | ||
:Perfectly ok with me. Go ahead. | |||
:--[[User:Qazaaq|Qazaaq]] 13:18, 24 November 2010 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:18, 24 November 2010
Shortages[edit source]
I'm not a friend of making a ".. re-jig of the instructions in the Wiki for the packages". If package pages are edited with more information,it isn't reflected here. (It is a general rule for knowledge bases to avoid double occurrences of records.) - I suggest to replaces the "re-jig" with short descritive sentences of the purpose of the packages and for details provide the links to the package pages. Is this ok for everybody? --Clearance 00:01, 24 November 2010 (EST)
- Perfectly ok with me. Go ahead.
- --Qazaaq 13:18, 24 November 2010 (EST)