Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bribery"
imported>Halo112358 |
imported>Kkuhlmann |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Thanks for the heads up about the deprecated stuff :) | Thanks for the heads up about the deprecated stuff :) | ||
--[[User:Halo112358|Halo112358]] 23:56, 5 April 2006 (EDT) | --[[User:Halo112358|Halo112358]] 23:56, 5 April 2006 (EDT) | ||
I'm thinking about turning this into a category, so the related gamesettings can be tagged in its category and will automatically link to it. Let me know if anyone thinks this is a bad idea.--[[User:Kkuhlmann|Kkuhlmann]] 09:41, 14 April 2006 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 08:41, 14 April 2006
Defaults?[edit source]
I like the cosmetic changes but it would be a good idea to add the default values of the settings. I will add them later if no one has. Also, one reason the category was listed is so that you can get to the settings category from this page, without the category set there isn't a link to [[:Category:Settings] on this page. I'm hoping eventually (once all the settings are described) we can work out a better system that uses categories, perhaps break it into sub-cats with Category:Settings_Integer, etc? We can figure that out later I guess. Daego 16:07, 2 April 2006 (EDT)
I like this page a lot, it makes a lot of sense to group these settings together. We should try and figure out the bribery formula and include it as well. I wouldn't bother subdividing the settings category until it really needs it, that that just sounds like un-necessary work at this stage.--Halo112358 00:43, 3 April 2006 (EDT)
Thanks for the heads up about the deprecated stuff :) --Halo112358 23:56, 5 April 2006 (EDT)
I'm thinking about turning this into a category, so the related gamesettings can be tagged in its category and will automatically link to it. Let me know if anyone thinks this is a bad idea.--Kkuhlmann 09:41, 14 April 2006 (EDT)