Difference between revisions of "Talk:ESM Math Library"
imported>DragoonWraith (Should be a category) |
imported>DragoonWraith m (forgot to have my signature) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
We should make this a subcategory of [[Category: Useful Code|Useful Code]], or else make Useful Code a subcategory of this, and make this a category. Each of those functions should be its own article. I don't have time to do that right now, so I just threw the Scripting and Useful Code categories onto this article, but someone really needs to reorganize this. | We should make this a subcategory of [[Category: Useful Code|Useful Code]], or else make Useful Code a subcategory of this, and make this a category. Each of those functions should be its own article. I don't have time to do that right now, so I just threw the Scripting and Useful Code categories onto this article, but someone really needs to reorganize this. | ||
Great idea, however. | Great idea, however.--[[User:DragoonWraith|DragoonWraith]] 14:00, 9 May 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:00, 9 May 2006
Wouldn't it make more sense to split each set of functions into separate quests by type? So instead of just "FunctionQuestScript" with who knows how many stages we'll end up with, how about "TrigFuncQuestScript" for the content that is there now, and separate quests for other libraries. Just basic module/packaged code, in other words. -- Nezroy 13:48, 9 May 2006 (EDT)
Should be a category
We should make this a subcategory of, or else make Useful Code a subcategory of this, and make this a category. Each of those functions should be its own article. I don't have time to do that right now, so I just threw the Scripting and Useful Code categories onto this article, but someone really needs to reorganize this.
Great idea, however.--DragoonWraith 14:00, 9 May 2006 (EDT)