Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ashileedo"
imported>Doppelganger (Documentation Requests) |
imported>Doppelganger |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Documentation Requests == | == Documentation Requests == | ||
The reason for my experimentation with [[ModActorValue]] and erronous conclusion was a lack of documentation. I had tried posting a couple of threads on the TES CS forum, but they quickly get buried with no response. With this in mind, there is no outlet (that I know of) to get even the kernel of the truth, and I resorted to simply being more accusational to draw fire. Can there be some sort of way to address this ad hoc means of obtaining information? | [[User:Doppelganger|Doppelganger]] 20:29, 3 April 2006 (EDT): The reason for my experimentation with [[ModActorValue]] and erronous conclusion was a lack of documentation. I had tried posting a couple of threads on the TES CS forum, but they quickly get buried with no response. With this in mind, there is no outlet (that I know of) to get even the kernel of the truth, and I resorted to simply being more accusational to draw fire. Can there be some sort of way to address this ad hoc means of obtaining information? | ||
I also wrote here because I requested in the [[ModActorValue]] about how I could access the various script/magic modifiers. | I also wrote here because I requested in the [[ModActorValue]] about how I could access the various script/magic modifiers. |
Revision as of 19:29, 3 April 2006
It really is a good idea. If everyone uses this wiki to share their hard-earned knowledge about the Construction Set, it will become a valuable community resource.--Mozz 22:11, 26 March 2006 (EST)
Um... you blocked User:Winston1 indefinitely for a single [edit]pair of -- oops[/edit] occurrence of vandalism? That's a bit harsh... the spirit of a Wiki is experimentation. S/he should have fixed the tweaks s/he made, absolutely, but I figure s/he should've just been reverted first, warned second, and banned third. =) (Granted, I'm unaware of any possible exchanges or correspondence that could've been going on behind the scenes...) --JT 15:56, 31 March 2006 (EST)
Documentation Requests
Doppelganger 20:29, 3 April 2006 (EDT): The reason for my experimentation with ModActorValue and erronous conclusion was a lack of documentation. I had tried posting a couple of threads on the TES CS forum, but they quickly get buried with no response. With this in mind, there is no outlet (that I know of) to get even the kernel of the truth, and I resorted to simply being more accusational to draw fire. Can there be some sort of way to address this ad hoc means of obtaining information?
I also wrote here because I requested in the ModActorValue about how I could access the various script/magic modifiers.