Difference between revisions of "Talk:FBuoyancyWood"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Elim Garak m (typos) |
imported>Niaht |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'd like to add that the material of stuff is defined in the bhk...Shape - blocks of the nif, but i'd say it would clutter the articles to add it to each of the FBuoyancy-Articles. Maybe the fBuoyancy-Articles would be better combined to a single Article? --[[User:Elim Garak|Elim Garak]] 05:37, 29 December 2007 (EST) | I'd like to add that the material of stuff is defined in the bhk...Shape - blocks of the nif, but i'd say it would clutter the articles to add it to each of the FBuoyancy-Articles. Maybe the fBuoyancy-Articles would be better combined to a single Article? --[[User:Elim Garak|Elim Garak]] 05:37, 29 December 2007 (EST) | ||
:I think that's a good idea. All these really need is the boilerplate statement that was mostly already there in each one, along with the default value and what objects or type of objects the setting affects. I'm very new here, so I'm just weighing in with my opinion since I decided to fuss with these today. --[[User:Niaht|Niaht]] 06:46, 29 December 2007 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 06:46, 29 December 2007
I'd like to add that the material of stuff is defined in the bhk...Shape - blocks of the nif, but i'd say it would clutter the articles to add it to each of the FBuoyancy-Articles. Maybe the fBuoyancy-Articles would be better combined to a single Article? --Elim Garak 05:37, 29 December 2007 (EST)
- I think that's a good idea. All these really need is the boilerplate statement that was mostly already there in each one, along with the default value and what objects or type of objects the setting affects. I'm very new here, so I'm just weighing in with my opinion since I decided to fuss with these today. --Niaht 06:46, 29 December 2007 (EST)