Difference between revisions of "Talk:Algohol"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Haama (Not going to do function pages yet) |
imported>Speedo (A thought) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I haven't used Algohol, so I wasn't too comfortable about writing up the normal function pages for it. For now, though, this contains all the information in Entim's Opening Post, so it should do the trick.--[[User:Haama|Haama]] 10:35, 20 February 2008 (EST) | I haven't used Algohol, so I wasn't too comfortable about writing up the normal function pages for it. For now, though, this contains all the information in Entim's Opening Post, so it should do the trick.--[[User:Haama|Haama]] 10:35, 20 February 2008 (EST) | ||
:That's something to think about, actually... do we want to go ahead and fully "flesh out" OBSE plugins (as a category, with individual pages for each function) even if we can only put a few words from a readme on each page - like I just did with the LCD plugin? Or just put up a basic list like this and hope that someone comes along who's more familiar with the plugin and can offer better descriptions/explanations?--[[User:Speedo|Speedo]] 04:55, 30 March 2008 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 03:55, 30 March 2008
I haven't used Algohol, so I wasn't too comfortable about writing up the normal function pages for it. For now, though, this contains all the information in Entim's Opening Post, so it should do the trick.--Haama 10:35, 20 February 2008 (EST)
- That's something to think about, actually... do we want to go ahead and fully "flesh out" OBSE plugins (as a category, with individual pages for each function) even if we can only put a few words from a readme on each page - like I just did with the LCD plugin? Or just put up a basic list like this and hope that someone comes along who's more familiar with the plugin and can offer better descriptions/explanations?--Speedo 04:55, 30 March 2008 (EDT)