Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Users: Spammer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>ShadowDancer (spammers and classification) |
imported>JOG (Definition of Spammer) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:[[User:ShadowDancer|ShadowDancer]] 21:45, 9 July 2006 (EDT): At very least it is an easy way to keep an eye on what should be suspect based on past inclination if they do post something else under that name. It would also make an easy list to follow for banning the user if someone with that ability so desired. It is certainly easy enough to check in the recent changes as to what they did in order to get classified as a spammer so I doubt that a war would develop over this. | :[[User:ShadowDancer|ShadowDancer]] 21:45, 9 July 2006 (EDT): At very least it is an easy way to keep an eye on what should be suspect based on past inclination if they do post something else under that name. It would also make an easy list to follow for banning the user if someone with that ability so desired. It is certainly easy enough to check in the recent changes as to what they did in order to get classified as a spammer so I doubt that a war would develop over this. | ||
::It should be clear: A spammer is someone who advertises porn pages or online shops or adds hidden links to cheat at search-engine rating. A spammer is NOT someone who asks off topic questions or writes stuff you don't like--[[User:JOG|JOG]] 12:25, 12 July 2006 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:25, 12 July 2006
I understand the intent behind this category (I think), but is it really helpful? I wouldn't like to see a war develop over who deserves classification as a spammer. If a user is placed on this list, is any action taken to monitor his posts? Scruggs 19:27, 9 July 2006 (EDT)
- ShadowDancer 21:45, 9 July 2006 (EDT): At very least it is an easy way to keep an eye on what should be suspect based on past inclination if they do post something else under that name. It would also make an easy list to follow for banning the user if someone with that ability so desired. It is certainly easy enough to check in the recent changes as to what they did in order to get classified as a spammer so I doubt that a war would develop over this.
- It should be clear: A spammer is someone who advertises porn pages or online shops or adds hidden links to cheat at search-engine rating. A spammer is NOT someone who asks off topic questions or writes stuff you don't like--JOG 12:25, 12 July 2006 (EDT)