User talk:Ashileedo

It really is a good idea. If everyone uses this wiki to share their hard-earned knowledge about the Construction Set, it will become a valuable community resource.--Mozz 22:11, 26 March 2006 (EST)

Um... you blocked User:Winston1 indefinitely for a single [edit]pair of -- oops[/edit] occurrence of vandalism? That's a bit harsh... the spirit of a Wiki is experimentation. S/he should have fixed the tweaks s/he made, absolutely, but I figure s/he should've just been reverted first, warned second, and banned third. =) (Granted, I'm unaware of any possible exchanges or correspondence that could've been going on behind the scenes...) --JT 15:56, 31 March 2006 (EST)

Documentation Requests

Doppelganger 20:29, 3 April 2006 (EDT): The reason for my experimentation with ModActorValue and erronous conclusion was a lack of documentation. I had tried posting a couple of threads on the TES CS forum, but they quickly get buried with no response. With this in mind, there is no outlet (that I know of) to get even the kernel of the truth, and I resorted to simply being more accusational to draw fire. Can there be some sort of way to address this ad hoc means of obtaining information?

I also wrote here because I requested in the ModActorValue about how I could access the various script/magic modifiers.

I understand your frustration but please ask for your patience. The community is still learning about the Construction Set and the game, and we ourselves have other commitments internally that will take priority over this wiki. Which is why we made it a wiki - so that it could grow along with the modding community. I only ask that we keep the information posted on the site as factual and unbiased as possible. We will try to provide as much information as quickly as we can, but it will never be as fast as you or the fans will like, and I apologize for that. I will say that keeping your tone and attitude accusational to "draw fire" is not the best way to ask developers to put in extra time to answer questions.