Difference between revisions of "Talk:Container"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Updated article:
imported>Shademe (→Updated article: Clarifications) |
imported>Shademe |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:1. The weight being set to 0 was extracted from the previous version of the article - It said that the weight must always be set to 0 to make sure the container isn't affected by physics. It does sound far-fetched. As far as weight ''limit'' goes, I haven't a clue as to what it does. It looks like the many other seemingly-irrelevant fields CS shows in different objects. | :1. The weight being set to 0 was extracted from the previous version of the article - It said that the weight must always be set to 0 to make sure the container isn't affected by physics. It does sound far-fetched. As far as weight ''limit'' goes, I haven't a clue as to what it does. It looks like the many other seemingly-irrelevant fields CS shows in different objects. | ||
:2. I just know that adding leveled items to inventories will cause the encumbrance to go negative. Apparently(tested really quickly), every LI - no matter what weight the contents have - added will cause the encumbrance to decrease by 1 in the CS. | :2. I just know that adding leveled items to inventories will cause the encumbrance to go negative. Apparently(tested really quickly), every LI - no matter what weight the contents have - added will cause the encumbrance to decrease by 1 in the CS. | ||
:3. I think flagging an object as a Quest Item generally keeps it loaded in memory, irrespective of the reference's persistence. | :3. I think flagging an object as a Quest Item generally keeps it loaded in memory, irrespective of the reference's persistence. Also, as it was suggested by [[User:Noah]], the field could be unsupported for such objects. | ||
:4. Not sure about this particular claim, but seems logical. Is there any way to test it ? | :4. Not sure about this particular claim, but seems logical. Is there any way to test it ? | ||
: -- [[User:Shademe|shadeMe]] [[User_talk:Shademe|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">TALK</span>]] 21:04, 12 April 2009 (EDT) | : -- [[User:Shademe|shadeMe]] [[User_talk:Shademe|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">TALK</span>]] 21:04, 12 April 2009 (EDT) | ||