Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Editing Dialogue"

From the Oblivion ConstructionSet Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Elessar VPR
 
imported>Elessar VPR
Line 3: Line 3:
This is quite a hinderance as practically every quest mod will want to add something to GREETINGS. It is possible to get around this by always adding topics you want the NPC's to have immediately having spoken to them via scripts, but not every quest mod already done does this and it is causing some issues
This is quite a hinderance as practically every quest mod will want to add something to GREETINGS. It is possible to get around this by always adding topics you want the NPC's to have immediately having spoken to them via scripts, but not every quest mod already done does this and it is causing some issues
--[[User:Elessar VPR|Elessar VPR]] 22:34, 30 May 2006 (EDT)
--[[User:Elessar VPR|Elessar VPR]] 22:34, 30 May 2006 (EDT)
Further testing seems to confirm this, see the post by JOG  [[User  talk:Kkuhlmann|here]] and this [http://www.elderscrolls.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=462469&st=0&gopid=6708154&#entry6708154 thread] --[[User:Elessar VPR|Elessar VPR]] 16:14, 6 June 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:14, 6 June 2006

There seem to be some problems when using the Add Topic box for GREETINGS. That is, that if many mods add a line to the GREETINGS topic, even if it's unique to their mod (unique NPC, Quest etc..), the outputs of the Add Topic box only seems to function for the last mod in the load order that alter the GREETINGS topic. The lines of dialogue will play fine, but the topics will not be added properly if they use the Add Topic Box, unless it is the last one in the load order.

This is quite a hinderance as practically every quest mod will want to add something to GREETINGS. It is possible to get around this by always adding topics you want the NPC's to have immediately having spoken to them via scripts, but not every quest mod already done does this and it is causing some issues --Elessar VPR 22:34, 30 May 2006 (EDT)


Further testing seems to confirm this, see the post by JOG here and this thread --Elessar VPR 16:14, 6 June 2006 (EDT)