Difference between revisions of "Talk:DDS Tools Listing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>DragoonWraith (how is Photoshop more difficult to use?) |
imported>Lhammonds (Feedback) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Now, I've spent a fair bit of time with Photoshop, but I fail to see why it's more difficult to use. I have used both GIMP and PaintShopPro, and while both did things differently, I wouldn't say any one approach was necessarily easier (though I found the GIMP's layout and UI confusing as hell, I must say). So while I'm not going to unilaterally remove that line, I am questioning why it's there. Anyone care to comment?<br /> | Now, I've spent a fair bit of time with Photoshop, but I fail to see why it's more difficult to use. I have used both GIMP and PaintShopPro, and while both did things differently, I wouldn't say any one approach was necessarily easier (though I found the GIMP's layout and UI confusing as hell, I must say). So while I'm not going to unilaterally remove that line, I am questioning why it's there. Anyone care to comment?<br /> | ||
[[User:DragoonWraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">D</span>ragoon <span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">W</span>raith]] [[User_talk:DragoonWraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">TALK</span>]] 16:41, 12 June 2008 (EDT) | [[User:DragoonWraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">D</span>ragoon <span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">W</span>raith]] [[User_talk:DragoonWraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">TALK</span>]] 16:41, 12 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
::Would you agree that Photoshop has THE MOST amount of options and plugins available out of what is listed? With more options comes more learning, more complexity and can be quite daunting to somebody that is only familiar with Windows XP and MS Paint. With a person such as that, Paint.NET would be an easier package especially with it supporting DDS format natively unlike all other paint programs. That's my 2 cents. | |||
::--[[User:Lhammonds|LHammonds]] 19:03, 12 June 2008 (EDT) |
Revision as of 18:03, 12 June 2008
Created by: LHammonds (with help by throttlekitty)
Date Last Modified: 23:00, 27 July 2007 (EDT)
Last Modified by: LHammonds
Photoshop "Not as easy as alternatives"?
Now, I've spent a fair bit of time with Photoshop, but I fail to see why it's more difficult to use. I have used both GIMP and PaintShopPro, and while both did things differently, I wouldn't say any one approach was necessarily easier (though I found the GIMP's layout and UI confusing as hell, I must say). So while I'm not going to unilaterally remove that line, I am questioning why it's there. Anyone care to comment?
Dragoon Wraith TALK 16:41, 12 June 2008 (EDT)
- Would you agree that Photoshop has THE MOST amount of options and plugins available out of what is listed? With more options comes more learning, more complexity and can be quite daunting to somebody that is only familiar with Windows XP and MS Paint. With a person such as that, Paint.NET would be an easier package especially with it supporting DDS format natively unlike all other paint programs. That's my 2 cents.
- --LHammonds 19:03, 12 June 2008 (EDT)