Difference between revisions of "Questions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Uhm, moving DW's comment to the proper location?
imported>DragoonWraith |
imported>ShadowDancer (Uhm, moving DW's comment to the proper location?) |
||
| Line 1,479: | Line 1,479: | ||
:::::::: @ DragoonWraith : I put the ref in case he would have wanted to store it somewhere, like in a marking effect or something. I tried to answer the original question "how does one get the ref that has been hit ?". [[User:Gamall|Gamall]] 19:10, 23 July 2006 (EDT) | :::::::: @ DragoonWraith : I put the ref in case he would have wanted to store it somewhere, like in a marking effect or something. I tried to answer the original question "how does one get the ref that has been hit ?". [[User:Gamall|Gamall]] 19:10, 23 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
:::::::::[[User:DragoonWraith|<font face="Oblivion,Daedric Runes" size=3>D</font>ragoon <font face="Oblivion,Daedric" size=3>W</font>raith]] [[User_talk:DragoonWraith|<font face="Oblivion,Daedric" size=2>TALK</font>]] 20:40, 23 July 2006 (EDT): Fair enough. I was basing mine on the script he posted, but you are correct about the actual question asked. | |||
== Get In Wilderness? == | == Get In Wilderness? == | ||
| Line 1,506: | Line 1,508: | ||
::::::[[User:DragoonWraith|<font face="Oblivion,Daedric Runes" size=3>D</font>ragoon <font face="Oblivion,Daedric" size=3>W</font>raith]] [[User_talk:DragoonWraith|<font face="Oblivion,Daedric" size=2>TALK</font>]] 12:00, 23 July 2006 (EDT): Haven't tried it, but "same functionality as GetInCell" reads to me to mean that it has the exact same workings, i.e. same limitations. Maybe I'll test it later - at the moment, I have no need for it, as I've figured out a better way to do it anyway. | ::::::[[User:DragoonWraith|<font face="Oblivion,Daedric Runes" size=3>D</font>ragoon <font face="Oblivion,Daedric" size=3>W</font>raith]] [[User_talk:DragoonWraith|<font face="Oblivion,Daedric" size=2>TALK</font>]] 12:00, 23 July 2006 (EDT): Haven't tried it, but "same functionality as GetInCell" reads to me to mean that it has the exact same workings, i.e. same limitations. Maybe I'll test it later - at the moment, I have no need for it, as I've figured out a better way to do it anyway. | ||