Difference between revisions of "Talk:ESM Math Library"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
imported>DragoonWraith m (forgot to have my signature) |
imported>JustTim |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Wouldn't it make more sense to split each set of functions into separate quests by type? So instead of just "FunctionQuestScript" with who knows how many stages we'll end up with, how about "TrigFuncQuestScript" for the content that is there now, and separate quests for other libraries. Just basic module/packaged code, in other words. -- [[User:Nezroy|Nezroy]] 13:48, 9 May 2006 (EDT) | Wouldn't it make more sense to split each set of functions into separate quests by type? So instead of just "FunctionQuestScript" with who knows how many stages we'll end up with, how about "TrigFuncQuestScript" for the content that is there now, and separate quests for other libraries. Just basic module/packaged code, in other words. -- [[User:Nezroy|Nezroy]] 13:48, 9 May 2006 (EDT) | ||
It depends... you got up to 255 stages which is enough for quite a while. I've chosen to use one quest to make the setup easier. Adding stages to you quest is many times easier than adding full quests. If it would be possible to share a library as stand-alone plugin to use it in other plugins without hassle then i'd fully agree with you, but since this isn't possible and you've got to set up your quests "by hand", just having one quest is (IMO) the better solution. As long as the number of functions doesn't exceed the limit. --[[User:JustTim|JustTim]] 14:10, 9 May 2006 (EDT) | |||
== Should be a category == | == Should be a category == | ||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
Great idea, however.--[[User:DragoonWraith|DragoonWraith]] 14:00, 9 May 2006 (EDT) | Great idea, however.--[[User:DragoonWraith|DragoonWraith]] 14:00, 9 May 2006 (EDT) | ||
You are presumably right, but this "someone" should better be anyone with a better sense for organisation and structuring than i. :) | |||