Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wish List"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
223 bytes added ,  22:01, 19 April 2006
no edit summary
imported>GreyWanderer
(suggestions: priority listing, 2 subcategories for Scripting, bug category)
imported>Grundulum
Line 3: Line 3:
:I don't know, I signed mine but I also referenced them in another talk page (Magic Effects). I think a got a little carried away with my list. I tried starting a thread on the forum for new functions a week ago but it was generally ignored. Too much traffic on there anyway, this list is better... I should note the reasoning for everything I suggested is point blank to simplify scripting. The more we can minimize the required use of hacks, workarounds, and excessively large scripts the better. At the same time there is a lot of room for improvement and a number of nearly required functions that are just missing (e.g. companion share). --[[User:MegaBurn|MegaBurn]] 04:38, 13 April 2006 (EDT)
:I don't know, I signed mine but I also referenced them in another talk page (Magic Effects). I think a got a little carried away with my list. I tried starting a thread on the forum for new functions a week ago but it was generally ignored. Too much traffic on there anyway, this list is better... I should note the reasoning for everything I suggested is point blank to simplify scripting. The more we can minimize the required use of hacks, workarounds, and excessively large scripts the better. At the same time there is a lot of room for improvement and a number of nearly required functions that are just missing (e.g. companion share). --[[User:MegaBurn|MegaBurn]] 04:38, 13 April 2006 (EDT)


::I'd want a list sorted by priority. The Item/Inventory Scan (is in list, but missing proper description) and Object/Cell Scan (not on list so far) functions are almost mandatory functions. The possibility to determine the type of a ref (e.g. potion, weapon, armor, ...) also is (and not on the list).
I'd want a list sorted by priority. The Item/Inventory Scan (is in list, but missing proper description) and Object/Cell Scan (not on list so far) functions are almost mandatory functions. The possibility to determine the type of a ref (e.g. potion, weapon, armor, ...) also is (and not on the list).
::Also missing is GetSoundPlayed.  I'd like to have sections "(was) in Morrowind" and maybe "(was) in MW Script Extenders". I will add the missing ones later, but I wanted to state that Devs should see what is HIGHLY important (companion share is, too).
:Also missing is GetSoundPlayed.  I'd like to have sections "(was) in Morrowind" and maybe "(was) in MW Script Extenders". I will add the missing ones later, but I wanted to state that Devs should see what is HIGHLY important (companion share is, too).
::There could be an engine-bug priority listing (broken functions to be fixed) for both CS and Scripting. '''No Quest Bugs'''.
:There could be an engine-bug priority listing (broken functions to be fixed) for both CS and Scripting. '''No Quest Bugs'''.
::I'd suggest in order to determine the priority we list the nicknames here and everyone can choose 3 top priority wishes in every category (General/Scripting). All four paragraphs by -- [[User:GreyWanderer|Grey]] 21:54, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
:I'd suggest in order to determine the priority we list the nicknames here and everyone can choose 3 top priority wishes in every category (General/Scripting). All four paragraphs by -- [[User:GreyWanderer|Grey]] 21:54, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
 
: Priority listing sounds to me like a great excuse for an edit war.  Maybe I'm just being pessimistic.  I like the thought of "Was in Morrowind/Script Extender", though. [[User:Grundulum|Grundulum]] 23:01, 19 April 2006 (EDT)
Anonymous user

Navigation menu