Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Functions"

Category talk:Functions (edit)

512 bytes added , 16:20, 10 June 2007

no edit summary

Anonymous user

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 :::::::[[User:DragoonWraith|<font face="Oblivion,Daedric Runes" size=2>D</font>ragoon <font face="Oblivion,Daedric Runes" size=2>W</font>raith]] [[User_talk:DragoonWraith|<font face="Oblivion,Daedric" size=2>TALK</font>]] 12:27, 10 June 2007 (EDT): So we should divide things by v0.8 (the version of the CS originally released to us - I'm fairly certain that we never got v1.0), v1.2, and OBSE then? Sounds good to me. Do you like the idea of having the different categories, each with an "all" section, a "0.8" section, a "1.2" section (if warranted), and an "OBSE" section?
+:Sounds good. I suppose it should default to the "all" version of the category (if it's set up to have a default) with clear OBSE markings? Don't know, most of the contributors seem to use OBSE, but don't know about the readers, and there's a substantial dislike of OBSE on the forums, so maybe the default should be of the vanilla functions.[[User:Haama|Haama]] 17:20, 10 June 2007 (EDT)
 == Unducumented script functions found ==
@@ Line 50: / Line 52: @@
 Are they useful for anything? --[[User:JustTim|JustTim]] 12:28, 10 May 2006 (EDT)
+Hmm... name menu... is it possible to copy the player's name to something?[[User:Haama|Haama]] 17:20, 10 June 2007 (EDT)