Difference between revisions of "Category talk:OBSE Functions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>JOG (CON_* sorting a bit weird, IMO...) |
imported>Haama |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldn't CON_*.* be sortet in in "C" instead of the starting letter of the consolefunctions?--[[User:JOG|JOG]] 03:27, 26 August 2006 (EDT) | Shouldn't CON_*.* be sortet in in "C" instead of the starting letter of the consolefunctions?--[[User:JOG|JOG]] 03:27, 26 August 2006 (EDT) | ||
:[[User:DragoonWraith|<font face="Oblivion,Daedric Runes" size=2>D</font>ragoon <font face="Oblivion,Daedric Runes" size=2>W</font>raith]] [[User_talk:DragoonWraith|<font face="Oblivion,Daedric" size=2>TALK</font>]] 08:14, 26 August 2006 (EDT): The reason I didn't was because I didn't want the console functions to all be listed under 'C' in [[:Category:OBSE Console Functions|Console Functions]], and I figured alphabetization should be consistent. If you think it's better to have them all under 'C' in OBSE Functions, then all that would need to be done is to change <nowiki>[[Category: OBSE Functions|<function name>]]</nowiki> on the bottom of each page to <nowiki>[[Category: OBSE Functions]]</nowiki>. | |||
== Doubt about categories for OBSE functions == | |||
I'm checking and updating all OBSE functions. When I find a function with the old categories (OBSE <category>) I use to add the new ones (<category> (OBSE)). Must I delete the old categories from these functions? I ask it because I have found some functions with both kind of categories. Can somebody clearify this to me? Thank you. | |||
--[[User:WereWolf|WereWolf]] 17:10, 11 September 2007 (EDT) | |||
:Yes, the old category type (OBSE <category>) is being phased out. Those were mistakes (or at one point, we were thinking about having both until everything was done, but it's not necessary). | |||
:--[[User:Haama|Haama]] 17:47, 11 September 2007 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:47, 11 September 2007
Shouldn't CON_*.* be sortet in in "C" instead of the starting letter of the consolefunctions?--JOG 03:27, 26 August 2006 (EDT)
- Dragoon Wraith TALK 08:14, 26 August 2006 (EDT): The reason I didn't was because I didn't want the console functions to all be listed under 'C' in Console Functions, and I figured alphabetization should be consistent. If you think it's better to have them all under 'C' in OBSE Functions, then all that would need to be done is to change [[Category: OBSE Functions|<function name>]] on the bottom of each page to [[Category: OBSE Functions]].
Doubt about categories for OBSE functions[edit source]
I'm checking and updating all OBSE functions. When I find a function with the old categories (OBSE <category>) I use to add the new ones (<category> (OBSE)). Must I delete the old categories from these functions? I ask it because I have found some functions with both kind of categories. Can somebody clearify this to me? Thank you. --WereWolf 17:10, 11 September 2007 (EDT)
- Yes, the old category type (OBSE <category>) is being phased out. Those were mistakes (or at one point, we were thinking about having both until everything was done, but it's not necessary).
- --Haama 17:47, 11 September 2007 (EDT)