Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Inventory Functions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>DragoonWraith (New page: == This Category is Stupid == OK, I doubt I'll get a lot of feedback on this, but... this category is ''really'' stupid. Not so bad with the CS, really, but with OBSE... ''far'' too many t...) |
imported>Darkness X |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Does anyone have any ideas, thoughts, suggestions, or what have you?<br /> | Does anyone have any ideas, thoughts, suggestions, or what have you?<br /> | ||
[[User:DragoonWraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">D</span>ragoon <span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">W</span>raith]] [[User_talk:DragoonWraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">TALK</span>]] 23:49, 7 August 2010 (EDT) | [[User:DragoonWraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">D</span>ragoon <span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">W</span>raith]] [[User_talk:DragoonWraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">TALK</span>]] 23:49, 7 August 2010 (EDT) | ||
:Yeah, you're right. Most of those OBSE functions can't be categorized in only one category. More and more OBSE functions are being created. So... we really need to find a solution because if this problem isn't solved in the near future... these categories could become a total chaos. I know these things are ''labor-intensive and tedious'' but I want to help anyway. Maybe you should consider re-categorizing all OBSE functions first... (but this might actually take far longer than your idea). | |||
:[[User:Darkness X|<span style="color:black;">Darkness</span> <span style="font-size:1.1em;color:black;">X</span>]] [[User talk:Darkness X|<sup><span style="color:black;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 04:09, 8 August 2010 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 03:09, 8 August 2010
This Category is Stupid
OK, I doubt I'll get a lot of feedback on this, but... this category is really stupid. Not so bad with the CS, really, but with OBSE... far too many things have been shoved into this category when they really don't belong here - or they belong in other places also. For example, SetName - that's an actor function or an inventory function or a... anything that has a name function. The OBSE command docs have a far saner system of categorizing, but... changing things is labor-intensive, even with CSbot. I don't see myself doing it alone.
Does anyone have any ideas, thoughts, suggestions, or what have you?
Dragoon Wraith TALK 23:49, 7 August 2010 (EDT)
- Yeah, you're right. Most of those OBSE functions can't be categorized in only one category. More and more OBSE functions are being created. So... we really need to find a solution because if this problem isn't solved in the near future... these categories could become a total chaos. I know these things are labor-intensive and tedious but I want to help anyway. Maybe you should consider re-categorizing all OBSE functions first... (but this might actually take far longer than your idea).
- Darkness X Talk 04:09, 8 August 2010 (EDT)