Difference between revisions of "Talk:Activate"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→RunOnActivateBlock Flag
imported>DragoonWraith (→RunOnActivateBlock Flag: but...) |
imported>Waruddar |
||
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
:::But then the engine wouldn't know that the item was stolen in the first place, since that's also ExtraData, no? | :::But then the engine wouldn't know that the item was stolen in the first place, since that's also ExtraData, no? | ||
:::[[User:DragoonWraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">D</span>ragoon <span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">W</span>raith]] [[User_talk:DragoonWraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">TALK</span>]] 18:17, 1 February 2008 (EST) | :::[[User:DragoonWraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">D</span>ragoon <span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">W</span>raith]] [[User_talk:DragoonWraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion, Daedric Runes; size=2;">TALK</span>]] 18:17, 1 February 2008 (EST) | ||
::::Yeah, that's the kink in that theory. If the theory is true, then the fact that it checks the stolen status is a bug (likely an overlooked check in a sub function). If the theory is false, then I have absolutely no idea. Regardless, there's little chance of proving any of this. [[User:Waruddar|Waruddar]] 19:45, 1 February 2008 (EST) | |||