Page history
Talk: Activate
11 September 2011
→Odd bug when used on a door
+581
→Odd bug when used on a door
m+54
→Odd bug when used on a door: new section
+680
14 July 2009
9 June 2009
28 February 2009
→RunOnActivateBlock Flag: Text adjustements
m−26
→RunOnActivateBlock Flag: More tests
+1,108
→RunOnActivateBlock Flag: Self-activation
+302
→RunOnActivateBlock Flag: New findings
+1,441
11 August 2008
10 August 2008
→Fake "Nesting": Yes, it is useful
+726
→Fake "Nesting": is deep nesting really necessary/useful?
+525
30 July 2008
17 April 2008
16 April 2008
→Scripting Issues: Yes you can
+323
→Scripting Issues
+745
→Scripting Issues
+2
→Scripting Issues
+581
no edit summary
+372
3 April 2008
5 February 2008
1 February 2008
→RunOnActivateBlock Flag
+341
→RunOnActivateBlock Flag: but...
+420
→RunOnActivateBlock Flag
+479
→RunOnActivateBlock Flag: bizarre
+373
RunOnActivateBlock Flag
+801
13 September 2007
11 September 2007
important note
m+465
My signature
m+75
another solution
+524
the link on self activation does concern the onActivate block, and therefore it is not the same behaviour as some recursive process stacking
m−114
→Scripting Issues
+920
Removal of comment after having found another formulation of the same idea within this page
m−1,232
no edit summary
+1,232
14 July 2007
13 July 2007
no edit summary
m+6
no edit summary
+551
sig...
m+300
Go for it.
+309
no edit summary
+372
no edit summary
+980
Kkulmann appears to be offering a lot of incorrect information...
+456